Ākāśāt Patitaṃ: Many Forms, One Reality

Image
Adi Shankara: The image that's stayed with me forever Sanskrit and shlokas have always fascinated me. The sheer vastness of Sanskrit literature is humbling. There are enough verses, texts, commentaries and traditions to occupy many lifetimes, and still leave one feeling that one has barely scratched the surface. But I didn't think much about any of this when I was growing up. I would recite shlokas in the morning and evening without fail. They were simply part of life. The words were there, the rituals were there, the temples were there—but much of it happened in the background. I was busy with academics. There was no time for Sanskrit or Vedanta. At least, that is what I used to tell myself. Of course, time was never really the problem. I could spend five days watching a Test match from morning to evening and somehow consider that perfectly legitimate use of my time! The truth was simpler: Sanskrit and Vedanta had not yet become priorities. Gr...

When Grammar Met Clarity


Writing has always fascinated me. It’s such an interesting aspect of communication; you can pretty much convey anything you want, in any way you want. Even a grammatically incorrect sentence can carry its full meaning. Yet, somewhere along the way, we began mistaking good communication for intelligence.

“Oh, he writes and speaks so well.  He must be smart.”

Good communication can create a false sense of technical pride. I grew up believing that grammatical precision was the measure of knowledge. But in hindsight, that wasn’t entirely me; it was my teachers. They were absolutely particular that every sentence not only conveyed meaning, but also respected the sanctity of grammar. A misplaced article or preposition could invite the harshest of corrections.

Yesterday, my wife and I were talking about writing and as all conversations these days eventually do, it veered toward our kids’ writing. We were laughing over Sahana’s recent schoolwork: a delightful mix of humor, dialogue, and imagination. That conversation took me back to my own early years at BP Indian Public School in Malleswaram, Bangalore, where my first and second-grade teachers, Ms. Alice and Ms. June Kenneth, both Anglo-Indians, left a deep mark on me. They were exceptional. They cared not just that I wrote neatly within the lines, but that I respected the craft of writing itself. Even today, when I write an email or reply to a short text, I can still hear their voices in the back of my head, guiding me to get that article right, that comma placed correctly.

The English books from those years were wonderful, one focused on grammar, the other on literature. The Junior English series still lingers in my memory. They taught me similes, idioms, tenses, and prepositions - the quiet scaffolding of a language that would stay with me for life. Somewhere in those pages, I fell in love with English. Reading became pure joy, not for grades or recognition, but for the music of words.

For years, I judged conversations by their grammar. I believed that fluent English reflected education and intelligence. Over time - life and people - gently corrected me. I met individuals from vernacular backgrounds whose clarity of thought and depth of insight far exceeded their comfort with English. That’s when I realized something liberating: language is only a medium. Thought is the message. Fluency is a gift, but clarity is a virtue. Communication isn’t about showing mastery; it’s about building understanding.

I owe a lot to my early teachers. Their discipline helped me appreciate structure; their care helped me respect precision. But experience taught me something equally valuable - that expression transcends grammar. Today, I cherish both: the foundation of correctness and the freedom of genuine expression. Because in the end, writing isn’t about impressing; it’s about connecting.

Comments

Post a Comment